| 1 |
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 20:44:04 Tom H wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Am 21.05.2014 15:31, schrieb Tom H: |
| 5 |
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> |
| 6 |
wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> Do I still need these lines .. especially with a modern |
| 8 |
> >>> systemd/gnome3-environment? |
| 9 |
> >>> |
| 10 |
> >>> # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for |
| 11 |
> >>> # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). |
| 12 |
> >>> # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will |
| 13 |
> >>> # use almost no memory if not populated with files) |
| 14 |
> >>> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs |
| 15 |
> >>> nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 |
| 16 |
> >>> |
| 17 |
> >>> |
| 18 |
> >>> /dev/cdrw /media/cdrecorder auto |
| 19 |
> >>> user,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> >> From "src/core/mount-setup.c": |
| 22 |
> >> |
| 23 |
> >> { "tmpfs", "/dev/shm", "tmpfs", |
| 24 |
> >> "mode=1777", MS_NOSUID|MS_NODEV|MS_STRICTATIME, NULL, |
| 25 |
> >> MNT_FATAL|MNT_IN_CONTAINER }, |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > So the answer is "no" ? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> The answer is "no" unless you want to apply different perms to "/dev/shm". |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I went through a new installation recently and seem to recall that the fstab |
| 32 |
was rather empty from its usual entries. Will older installations eventually |
| 33 |
get an enotice to this effect with baselayout updates? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Mick |
Archives