| 1 |
No worries then. Thanks very much for the explanation. |
| 2 |
On Aug 22, 2013 10:31 PM, "Samuli Suominen" <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 22/08/13 22:22, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> What course of action would you recommend taking with regard to my |
| 7 |
>> original post? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm not sure if I understand your problem but... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Looks like nvidia-drivers-319.32 was stabilized without stabilizing |
| 13 |
> nvidia-settings-319.32 together with it. |
| 14 |
> You can file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ and request stabilization |
| 15 |
> of nvidia-settings-319.32 to match the current stable nvidia-drivers. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> You can also temporarily add entry to /etc/portage/package.keywords like |
| 18 |
> ~media-video/nvidia-settings-**319.32 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Anyway I wouldn't worry about it too much, they have been going in |
| 21 |
> different cycles for years and I don't ever remembering anyone reporting an |
| 22 |
> actual bug about it (other than what I just suggested, people get confused |
| 23 |
> by non-matching version numbers, ask questions, and end up filing |
| 24 |
> stabilization request ;-) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives