| 1 |
lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:41 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Samuel Baldwin wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>> > It provides a nice |
| 7 |
>> > change of pace, so that way, when you're running a terminal in X, it |
| 8 |
>> > doesn't look exactly like the regular shell. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Well - a terminal is something to work with. And this has to |
| 11 |
>> be functional and not "provide a change of pace". |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Totally. That's why I push YaKuake. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Do you happen to know if there's something like those "Quake shells" |
| 16 |
for Gnome as well? It really sounds interesting! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
>> My text color is black, as my background is white, which is, BTW, |
| 19 |
>> the best to read for the majority of people (if you're not handicapped, |
| 20 |
>> that is). That's so, because the contrast between the text and the |
| 21 |
>> background cannot be higher than with black on white (or white on |
| 22 |
>> black). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> You're using a CRT and a desktop, no doubt. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
You're wrong. I was writing that when I was at home, where I've |
| 27 |
got a notebook and a LCD. I've got no CRT at home anymore. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
But actually, I don't use bright white (eg. rgb(255,255,255)), |
| 30 |
but something that's a bit less bright. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
At work, at a CRT, I use bright white though. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> I don't think there's any setting that |
| 35 |
> is best, |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Well, yes, you're right. There are settings which are certainly very |
| 38 |
bad, but a "best for all" - hm, you're right, such a setting might |
| 39 |
not exist, even for "normal" non-handicapped people. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
It was the most I ever threw up, and it changed my life forever. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- Homer Simpson |
| 46 |
Homer Goes To College |
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives