1 |
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 02:20:08 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > No it wouldn't - DST makes it darker in the morning. When I was about |
4 |
> > 11, the government experimented with using BST all year round. One of |
5 |
> > the reasons given for not doing it was that kids would have to go to |
6 |
> > school in the dark. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> ... and the children's accident rate in Scotland shot up. |
9 |
|
10 |
They have re-examined the data and found that that was not necessarily |
11 |
true. While the accident rate in the morning did go up, the afternoon |
12 |
rate went down by more, because drivers are more alert in the morning so |
13 |
cope with the darkness better. |
14 |
|
15 |
It wasn't only Scotland, in fact they aren't affected that much anyway. I |
16 |
worked in Dundee one December and it was dark until almost 10am, without |
17 |
DST. When they trialled winter DST, I was going to school in the dark in |
18 |
London. |
19 |
|
20 |
> And what is this idea of saving daylight? Only an American could |
21 |
> conceive of such a nonsense (I hope). |
22 |
|
23 |
It was the Germans, during WW1, quickly copied by Britain. The idea was |
24 |
to improve the productivity of the factories. And you are saving |
25 |
daylight, you are saving up an hour of daylight that you would otherwise |
26 |
sleep through and spending it at a more suitable time a few hours later. |
27 |
|
28 |
No one suggested a Daylight Bank :-O |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Neil Bothwick |
33 |
|
34 |
Mouse: (n.) an input device used by management to force computer users to |
35 |
keep at least a part of their desks clean. |