1 |
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:22:00 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
[...] |
3 |
> >> That is a single X11 screen spread across two physical monitors. It |
4 |
> >> will not exhibit the gtk-3 selection bug. |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> Are you sure you have two desktops and it's not just a single desktop |
7 |
> >> that is spread across two monitors? Can you drag a window from one |
8 |
> >> monitor to the other? If you can, then it's a single desktop. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Yes, I can. |
11 |
> > When I maximize a window, it's only on 1 screen. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > This is how it seems "right" to me. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Why would I want it to be different? Eg. windows can't be moved between |
16 |
> > screens? I don't see the point of having more than 1 screen in that case. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> There's a few reasons you might want more than one screen. Primary one |
19 |
> is two heads and two video cards with different resolutions and dpi. |
20 |
> Xinerama and big desktop et al will use the lower setting for both. |
21 |
|
22 |
Another reason (e.g. my case) is one dual head video card, but |
23 |
monitors with different dpi and colorspace. I tried xinerama: it |
24 |
looks really ugly on such setup. |
25 |
|
26 |
One more reason already mentioned by Grant is true for my case too: |
27 |
in my window manager (e16) I can have independent desktops on each |
28 |
screen, but not in xinerama mode. Probably this can be fixed in |
29 |
software, but might require a lot of work. JFYI dwm allows |
30 |
independent work on xinerama screens, but I have another issues |
31 |
with dwm. |
32 |
|
33 |
Best regards, |
34 |
Andrew Savchenko |