1 |
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 20:43 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote: |
2 |
> So can you please tell me why you have chosen a specific DE and not |
3 |
> the other options ? |
4 |
> thanks. |
5 |
|
6 |
I think the key argument for a DE is integration - all the k* apps built |
7 |
to use k* libraries and backends, allowing them to share data and |
8 |
resources easily; and all the gnome apps using gnome libraries, etc. |
9 |
|
10 |
The main differences I see between KDE and GNOME (aside from the GTK/Qt |
11 |
differences) are that KDE feels like a much more modular approach (while |
12 |
still allowing integration with backend services), whereas GNOME tends |
13 |
towards a one-piece uniform (sure you can theme it (with an external |
14 |
addon) but it's still gnome-shell) "user-friendly" (hide the buttons you |
15 |
can break it with) environment; and to be honest I like features of |
16 |
both. |
17 |
|
18 |
I think this is why it comes down to a matter of taste, because in the |
19 |
end it's a question of what you find suits your needs. I like the |
20 |
modularity and, I guess, the traditional feel of KDE; but kdepim loosing |
21 |
a large portion of my work email kind of made me balk at using it for a |
22 |
while, and my requirement for MS Exchange integration (not by choice) |
23 |
meant either a (non-free though nicely functional) plugin for |
24 |
Thunderbird ([0] for those interested) or switching to GNOME/Evolution |
25 |
(which, admittedly, has it's own issues, but hasn't eaten my mail yet). |
26 |
|
27 |
Besides, I'm very indecisive - give it six months I'll be back on KDE or |
28 |
enlightenment ;) |
29 |
|
30 |
Also, I think your subject line, while a valiant effort, is the IT |
31 |
equivalent of "don't eat the cookies while I'm gone" :P |
32 |
|
33 |
Hope this doesn't muddy things up too much! |
34 |
-- |
35 |
wraeth <wraeth@×××××××××.au> |