| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote: |
| 2 |
> In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the |
| 3 |
> image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than |
| 4 |
> just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
First you use draw, which is used in convert, and then you speak of display. |
| 7 |
The latter is there to – well – display an image. My understanding of IM |
| 8 |
mechanics is basic, but just this evening I was working on a small IM-based |
| 9 |
script of my own. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Drawing is done on a canvas. So unless you start with an existing image file |
| 12 |
as a basis, IM needs to pick a default background colour, which in your case |
| 13 |
seems to be black. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> and can find nothing in the internet about it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Have you tried the IM website? |
| 18 |
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/draw/ |
| 19 |
https://imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#background |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
| 23 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The quickest way to a man’s heart is through his sternum. |
Archives