| 1 |
On 05/08/13 13:27, Marc Stürmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Why is was forked you ask? Because of the predictable Name stuff and |
| 3 |
> some People disliked the attitude of the udev programmer which was |
| 4 |
> "either my way or the high way." aside choice is always Good to have so |
| 5 |
> in the end IT was bound to happen sooner or later and is a Good thing to |
| 6 |
> have. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
nope, the forking happened before predictable network interface names. |
| 10 |
and forking udev was never the smart choice here, but it would be rather |
| 11 |
easy to port the old rule generator as a standalone udev helper and make |
| 12 |
it use free names like lan0, wireless0. |
| 13 |
as in, you don't change whole car if your tire blows out |
Archives