1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I also found this after the reply from Ian. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > https://www.backblaze.com/blog/3tb-hard-drive-failure/ |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > No wonder they had it on sale. Heck, why didn't they just say it was a |
10 |
> > good door stop instead of a hard drive??? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Yeah, the only reason I'd want to use that model drive is if I had a |
14 |
> raid5 composed of entirely different drives and for some reason the |
15 |
> discount on the Seagate 3TB drive let me bump it up to a raid6 (and to |
16 |
> be sure I'd never put more than one of those in an array). It is |
17 |
> basically a doorstop. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I had two of those go in the span of a year. One was replaced under |
20 |
> warranty. The next was the warranty replacement. That one was no |
21 |
> longer under warranty, but after a scathing Amazon review Seagate |
22 |
> actually commented on the review asking me to contact them about a |
23 |
> replacement. I didn't bother - I really was tired of swapping out |
24 |
> drives at that pace and didn't consider the considerably-higher risk |
25 |
> of a double failure worth it. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> i'd have to check - I think I picked a 4TB Seagate NAS drive to replace it. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Somebody suggested not buying Seagate. The thing is, EVERY |
30 |
> manufacturer has had drives like these. Well, the Hitachi drives |
31 |
> Backblaze goes on about would be an exception, but they're |
32 |
> SIGNIFICANTLY more expensive and I don't think it is worth the premium |
33 |
> in a RAID. For a single-drive system I'd strongly consider them. I |
34 |
> think I heard they were bought out at some point, so we'll see if |
35 |
> their reputation holds. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> And that's the thing with brand reputations. These days MBAs milk |
38 |
> reputations. Some finance guy realizes that people will buy this |
39 |
> year's drives based on last year's reputation and cuts some corners |
40 |
> and collects a huge bonus. Three years later everybody is dealing |
41 |
> with drive failures. Every vendor does it. That one Seagate model |
42 |
> was about the worst I've personally seen, but who knows what model is |
43 |
> being sold today that in three years will turn out to be just as bad, |
44 |
> and it could come from any of the vendors. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> I do try to look at the Backblaze stats for what they're worth, but I |
47 |
> think the general advice applies well. Make sure you have an |
48 |
> appropriate level of redundancy and backup strategy. Make sure to mix |
49 |
> models of drives in your RAIDs. The whole point of a RAID is to keep |
50 |
> the price down by increasing your tolerance of failures. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> And the whole NAS drive firmware thing really bugs me because they |
53 |
> charge a premium for a few bits in flash memory that should be |
54 |
> user-configurable anyway. Some of those drives have better vibration |
55 |
> resistance, which bugs me less. However, the bottom line is that they |
56 |
> probably will improve your RAID performance in the event of a failure, |
57 |
> and they probably do tend to cut the corners less on them. But who |
58 |
> knows, maybe the drive that fails next year will be the super-premium |
59 |
> edition. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> All of this goes to one of my drivers for using btrfs (and in this |
62 |
> regard zfs will do just as well). The checksumming means that I'm not |
63 |
> really trusting the drive or its firmware at all, and I scrub my |
64 |
> arrays weekly. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> Sorry you ended up with a bad drive... That model IS considerably |
67 |
> cheaper than most of the others... |
68 |
|
69 |
I was never able to get either zfs or btrfs to work correctly, zfs was |
70 |
very vulnerable -- I forgot to export a zfs on a usb drive and got an |
71 |
enless loop of processes untill I rebooted. Btrfs never did work for |
72 |
me, I created a pool, copied my root file system, usr and var into |
73 |
ssubvolumes, and copied my files, but when I would boot into it, |
74 |
everything was messed up, processes thought files were missing, very |
75 |
strange. So, how did you set up either one of those -- I would love to |
76 |
use it because I have ssds and I don't want to rely on their firmware |
77 |
either. |
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
-- |
81 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
82 |
How do |
83 |
you spend it? |
84 |
|
85 |
John Covici |
86 |
covici@××××××××××.com |