1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> Dale<rdalek1967<at> gmail.com> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>> Besides gcc, what is a good list |
7 |
>>> of critical software to use guickpkg |
8 |
>>> as to keep backup binaries? |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> FEATURES="buildpkg sandbox fixpackages parallel-fetch --keep-going" |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> I saw this (FEATURES="buildpkg") googling around. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> 1. What is a good list of software to use buildpkg on? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> 2. Once you decide those packages, where do you put |
19 |
> the list? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Surely I do not wish to use buildpkg on every installed |
22 |
> package, a few or maybe the entire @system. I have not |
23 |
> found the answer to [1] or [2]. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> This is muddy, because supposedly the "profile" |
26 |
> is suppose to protect the key packages for --depclean ? |
27 |
> [2] default/linux/amd64/10.0/desktop * |
28 |
> |
29 |
> So is gcc protected somehow by the "profile"? |
30 |
> I think not...... |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Still googling but not find any clear answers, |
34 |
> mostly cruft from years ago.... |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> James |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
Short version, man make.conf for more info. buildpkg, keeps a binary of |
42 |
EVERYTHING installed. Now buildsyspkg only keeps binaries for system |
43 |
packages. If you have plenty of disk space, I would use buildpkg. If |
44 |
you have a lappy or are short of disk space, then buildpkg would work. |
45 |
Just keep in mind that some packages may not get saved. After thinking |
46 |
about this, I'm pretty sure I lost python once and buildsyspkg didn't |
47 |
keep a binary copy around. Just try to emerge something without python |
48 |
installed. :-( |
49 |
|
50 |
There is no list for you to keep. Portage does that. |
51 |
|
52 |
That help? |
53 |
|
54 |
Dale |
55 |
|
56 |
:-) :-) |