1 |
> -----Original Message----- |
2 |
> From: Volker Armin Hemmann |
3 |
> [mailto:volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de] |
4 |
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:19 AM |
5 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
6 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> On Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007, Stroller wrote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > I believe that even Linus - who is noted for his long-standing |
12 |
> > opposition to v3 - would change his mind were he to |
13 |
> experience this. |
14 |
> > "They're using the operating system _I_ wrote to lock me out of _my |
15 |
> > own_ router?!?!?!?" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Linus has said it several times that he was ok with the thing |
18 |
> Tivo did. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> And Tivo is the reason for that clause in GPLv3. |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
23 |
|
24 |
TiVo took code, incorporated it into a product, and put the |
25 |
modified sources online so people could see them. The sources |
26 |
were heavily modified for a specialized device, but they were |
27 |
provided. They did not allow modified, and therefore potentially |
28 |
Compromised, devices connect to their network. |
29 |
|
30 |
This does not sound like theft of code, it sounds like sound network |
31 |
protocol. If you wish to maintain a secure environment that is stable |
32 |
for thousands of users, and has a lot of money riding on it, you do |
33 |
not allow compromised devices to connect. It is that simple. |
34 |
|
35 |
The TiVo thing was completely within the word and spirit of the GPL. |
36 |
It is sad that many zealots seem to interpret the texts otherwise. |
37 |
|
38 |
I should not be surprised since many people treat the Free Software |
39 |
movement as a religion for all practical purposes. In every religion |
40 |
you will find interpretations and possible corruptions of the groups |
41 |
texts. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |