Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] fate of nmh
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:51:15
Message-Id: 201007112247.12864.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] fate of nmh by covici@ccs.covici.com
1 On Sunday 11 July 2010 20:42:54 covici@××××××××××.com wrote:
2 > In check ing for updates today, I found the following:
3 >
4 > - mail-client/nmh-1.3-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
5 > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
6 > # Diego E. Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> (24 Jun 2010)
7 > # on behalf of QA team
8 > #
9 > # Fails to build with Berkeley DB 5.0 (#319937); current
10 > # stable fails to build with current stable glibc (bug
11 > # #320645), last activity in both ebuild and upstream in 2008
12 > # (and even then it wasn't from maintainers); uses $EDITOR
13 > # and $PAGER at build-time (bug #294762, and slightly related
14 > # bug #262150. One configure test becomes interactive if
15 > # app-editors/elvis is installed (bug #323541). Multiple
16 > # collisions.
17 > #
18 > # Feel free to pick this up and maintain it properly, but
19 > # unless a new maintainer can be found, this package is
20 > # slated for removal.
21 > #
22 > # Removal on 2010-08-23
23 >
24 > This is what I use for my mail reader -- with the emacs interface -- so
25 > I am wondering what I can do once this happens -- I imagine I can keep
26 > it installed, but it would not be a good situation.
27 >
28 > thanks in advance for any ideas.
29
30 Pick one:
31
32 1. use another mailer. There's no shortage of them
33 2. fix nmh yourself. It seems like no-one else is going to.
34
35
36 --
37 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] fate of nmh Bill Longman <bill.longman@×××××.com>