| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:35:50 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Or use a hardlink instead of a symlink. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I tend to stay away from hardlinks; ls IIRC can't differentiate between |
| 6 |
> hardlinks and normal files. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
There is no difference. A normal file entry in a directory is still a |
| 9 |
hardlink, what we generally call hardlinks are just additional copies, |
| 10 |
it's all the same file. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Thus, there's a possibility that I forgot |
| 13 |
> and accidentally change the one in /opt, which then get pushed to |
| 14 |
> bitbucket. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It doesn't matter where you change it when there's only one file. It |
| 17 |
means you can put the file where openrc seems to want it and keep it in |
| 18 |
your separate directory as you want. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
However, if symlinks have stopped working, there was either a conscious |
| 21 |
design decision or you've found a new bug. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Despite the cost of living it remains popular. |
Archives