1 |
I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful. |
2 |
|
3 |
I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems, |
4 |
and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice. |
5 |
|
6 |
Please, disparage with details! ;-) |
7 |
|
8 |
Thanks - Joseph |
9 |
|
10 |
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
11 |
> The 23/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
12 |
>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100 |
13 |
>> Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr> wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
>>> You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module means you turn the kernel to |
16 |
>>> "tained crap" because of the number of problems it causes, including |
17 |
>>> random memory curruption. |
18 |
>> Care to back that up with something resembling evidence? |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> EVERY out-of-tree module will taint the kernel. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> But not all virtualization solutions use out-of-tree module and from |
23 |
> those coming out-of-tree, few are taint as "crap". |
24 |
> |
25 |
>> As to whether it |
26 |
>> deserves the "crap" moniker is a matter of opinion |
27 |
> |
28 |
> ...I'd rather say a matter of facts. :-) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Every one is free to support virtualbox but forgetting to talk about |
31 |
> this taint level is not very fair, FMPOV. |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
University of Houston, Cougar Card services support. |