| 1 |
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:17:43 +0200, Norbert Kamenicky wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Are you making net.vpn0 a symlink to net.lo, as with net.eth0? If so, |
| 4 |
> > what happens if you do /etc/init.d/net.vpn0 start and eth0 is not |
| 5 |
> > running? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Of course I did ... and it simply works, except of route setup for vpn0 |
| 8 |
> (see my first reply) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't understand what you were asking for if it already works, apart |
| 11 |
from the routing which could be fixed with a net function. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
How does it deal with my second question above? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The three Rs of Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall. |
Archives