Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:29:11
Message-Id: 510EBA76.6000305@orlitzky.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output by Alan McKinnon
1 On 02/03/2013 01:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > emerge -e --keep-going @world
3 > shows output like this when a build fails:
4 >
5 > * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies:
6 > *
7 > * >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by:
8 > * (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-r1::gentoo, installed)
9 >
10 > I can't parse that. What kind of SLOT is "0/50=" ?
11 >
12 > So far this has happened twice. The packages that failed prior are not
13 > important,
14 > what is important is that when the depgraph is *recalculated*, I get
15 > that error.
16 > It's always that specific atom for icu causing issues and it's always
17 > pulled in
18 > by qt-<something>
19 >
20 > Anyone know what that atom means and if it's a bug or not?
21 >
22
23 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Sub-slots_and_Slot-Operators

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>