Archives
Archives
| From: | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user <Gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:57:09 |
| Message-Id: | CAA2qdGVQX1Od5XZVqY8ke6HPU2_=byNuUCBv_+j=8BgOD2c3Jg@mail.gmail.com |
| 1 | I noticed Dale's email (hi Dale!) [1] asking about which gcc / glibc |
| 2 | unstable to use. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Is there any consensus yet as to which 'gcc'? I'm planning on doing an |
| 5 | `emerge -e @system` on two fresh installs, one x86 and the other |
| 6 | amd64. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Should I go with 4.5.3? Or 4.5.2? Or play it safe and use 4.5.1-r1 |
| 9 | (which, based on b.g.o search [2], seems to have less (serious) bugs |
| 10 | compared to 4.5.2) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | [1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/234240 |
| 13 | [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&short_desc=gcc&resolution=---&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Rgds, |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer |
| 21 | My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |