1 |
On 06 May 2006 20:26, John Blinka wrote: |
2 |
> Uwe Thiem wrote: |
3 |
> >Right. Somewhat besides your question: Are you really using hubs? I also |
4 |
> > seem to remember from your original post that the terminals are connected |
5 |
> > by 10Mb/s which makes sense if you are using hubs. From my experience |
6 |
> > with server / thin client configurations, I would suggest to replace the |
7 |
> > hubs by switches and use 100Mb/s full duplex connections. That should |
8 |
> > boost the performance of your terminals by far. Anyway, this has nothing |
9 |
> > to do with your current problem. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> We originally used hubs and later moved to switches - my mistake. But |
12 |
> it hasn't made much difference in performance. Our performance bottleneck |
13 |
> is elsewhere. But that's another discussion. |
14 |
|
15 |
Hi John, I would like to come back to you on this off the list. Unfortunately, |
16 |
all mails to your email address bounce with "server unreachable". Do you have |
17 |
another email address? |
18 |
|
19 |
Uwe |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |