1 |
On Saturday 19 May 2012 13:09:45 Pandu Poluan wrote: |
2 |
> On May 19, 2012 6:46 PM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Willie Matthews wrote: |
4 |
> [le snip] |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > > You should really try changing you DNS server to some faster ones. I |
7 |
> > > was having this same problem with my ISP or DSL modem with built in |
8 |
> > > router taking a long time. I changed my DNS servers to Google DNS |
9 |
> > > Servers (8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8) and haven't had a problem. |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > My setup is a little different but all in all I would really suggest |
12 |
> > > you try a DNS server outside of your ISP. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I agree. My ISP is AT&T and I changed my DNS to Google's too. It is |
15 |
> > very fast compared to AT&T's servers. I have had AT&T's servers not |
16 |
> > respond for several seconds but Google's just seem to work. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Here's the result of a test comparing the performance of public DNS servers |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://www.thousandeyes.com/blog/public-dns-resolver-showdown |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Despite what the linked article said, in my experience, Level 3 |
24 |
> (4.2.2.[1-5]) is at least as fast as Google. I guess it depends on one's |
25 |
> ISP. But both of them are mucho faster (and much stabler) than my ISP's DNS |
26 |
> servers. |
27 |
|
28 |
I understand that Level 3 4.2.2.2 is not a public DNS server: |
29 |
|
30 |
http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/famous-dns-server/ |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
If my recent experience is correct (when I was trying to set up proxychains) |
34 |
connections to it are often dropped or at least throttled. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
Mick |