| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:39:27 -0400, ABCD wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> > It should, unless you are woefully out of date. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> Not true: the versions of portage that support sets (including @world) |
| 11 |
>> are all hardmasked currently. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Still? I unmasked them ages ago, but though that had all been sorted out |
| 14 |
> by now. But yes, sets are about the only recent portage feature not |
| 15 |
> supported by the stable version, my bad. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I believe the mask is still in place because of a couple issues with sets, |
| 19 |
as well as issues with FEATURES=preserve-libs. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
ABCD |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkpuIVYACgkQOypDUo0oQOpGUQCfWsKt5U5eTEVP4d7jFyGJovYS |
| 27 |
+SoAmgM1wW3lDgsgagNezODCSfcR/GiA |
| 28 |
=/dA2 |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives