1 |
On Sat, 15 March 2014, at 11:16 am, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote: |
4 |
>> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco <fturco@××××××××.fm> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
>>>> is the published MD5-hash still valid? |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
9 |
>>> e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and because |
14 |
>> no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is the |
15 |
>> md5sum I'm getting, too. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first |
18 |
>> message. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST file |
21 |
> hashes wrong?! |
22 |
|
23 |
Well, that's why I used the same URL given by Guido - I get a different md5sum from him. |
24 |
|
25 |
Whichever mirror Francesco used, I get the same md5sum that he posted. |
26 |
|
27 |
Stroller. |