Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:27:30
Message-Id: A4200B25-5466-496C-AB00-F185D4242276@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM by Mick
1 On Sat, 15 March 2014, at 11:16 am, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 11:06:22 Stroller wrote:
4 >> On Wed, 12 March 2014, at 4:01 pm, Francesco Turco <fturco@××××××××.fm>
5 > wrote:
6 >>>> is the published MD5-hash still valid?
7 >>>
8 >>> $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso
9 >>> e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso
10 >>>
11 >>> Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid.
12 >>
13 >> Since this thread seems to have taken on a life of its own, and because
14 >> no-one else has done so, I just wanted to check in and say this is the
15 >> md5sum I'm getting, too.
16 >>
17 >> I was careful to use the switch.ch URL that Guido gave in his first
18 >> message.
19 >
20 > Ha! Could it be that the mirror has a corrupt iso, or is the DIGEST file
21 > hashes wrong?!
22
23 Well, that's why I used the same URL given by Guido - I get a different md5sum from him.
24
25 Whichever mirror Francesco used, I get the same md5sum that he posted.
26
27 Stroller.