| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@×××××.com> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I don't really want it, but my system still has hal installed. |
| 6 |
> > According to equery depends, it seems that there are still two packages |
| 7 |
> that |
| 8 |
> > unconditionally |
| 9 |
> > depend on hal (besides hal-info): k3b and gnome-mount. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I don't care much about gnome-mount (this is primarily a KDE system), but |
| 12 |
> I |
| 13 |
> > definitely use |
| 14 |
> > K3B a lot. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > I don't see any use flags to change with respect to k3b, so I'm feeling |
| 17 |
> I''m |
| 18 |
> > missing something. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Help? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> You are not as far as I can tell. I was looking at that yesterday. Saw |
| 23 |
> the same thing. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
That's pretty strange. I loked further, and found that --depclean wanted to |
| 26 |
ditch the gnome-mounter, |
| 27 |
which I promptly unmerged myself, so K3B is the only thing left that wants |
| 28 |
hal. Of course, I'm |
| 29 |
sticking with x86 stable, which means hal-2.0.0. Maybe the ~x86 version in |
| 30 |
there fixes this? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives