| 1 |
Last week on all my systems emerge upgraded firefox (3.5.2-r1) |
| 2 |
and xul-runner (1.9.1.2-r2). |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Now it's decided it wants to downgrade all of them to 3.0.13 |
| 5 |
and 1.9.0.13. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Looking at the package database page, I see that firefox |
| 8 |
3.5.2-r1 is marked as unstable (~x86). Same for xulrunner |
| 9 |
1.3.1.2-r1. That explains why emerge wants to downgrade to the |
| 10 |
stable version: I don't have ~x86 unmasked for |
| 11 |
firefox/xulrunner and never have had. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What I don't understand is why they got upgraded last week. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last |
| 16 |
week and then changed back to unstable this week? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Jesus is my POSTMASTER |
| 20 |
at GENERAL ... |
| 21 |
visi.com |
Archives