1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 11 January 2008, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> 2nd question: I must be dense on this one so someone help me out. |
5 |
>> Since a USB stick is seen as a hard drive, why can't I do a standard |
6 |
>> install to it? Is it because until lately they haven't been large |
7 |
>> enough? I'm thinking of using an 8GB one. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> There's a few reasons: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1. The memory used on those devices has a limited life - about 100,000 |
13 |
> writes for the good ones and maybe 10,000 for the bad ones. With a |
14 |
> standard install, frequent writes are the norm (think cache and other |
15 |
> similar things). This usually ends up at the same spot on the disk, |
16 |
> meaning your new install will last about a month if you are lucky. |
17 |
> There are ways around this, for instance how a LiveCD does things. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> 2. Booting off it is a pain. You need drivers for the entire USB stack |
20 |
> at boot time, which usually means a ginormous initrd. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> 3. Size, which you mentioned |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
OK. Then maybe a better solution for a compact portable system would be |
26 |
an external HD. In the laptop size (2.5") the enclosure can just about |
27 |
fit in a shirt pocket. And some of them run off the USB interface. Not |
28 |
as small as a thumbdrive but close. |
29 |
|
30 |
Tony |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
34 |
-- Benjamin Franklin |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |