| 1 |
Edward M wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/21/2013 2:13 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> While I like Gigabyte as a brand, if this is going to be something |
| 4 |
>> that reduces the value of my purchase, I want to get something else. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Appears IOMMU is becoming an industry standard and is also being |
| 8 |
> used by other motherboard makers. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IOMMU-supporting_hardware |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is one thing I am trying to figure out. Is the iommu thing good or |
| 15 |
bad? It was disabled by default and I had to enable it. Then I had to |
| 16 |
edit the kernel command line to get the system to boot. I don't mind it |
| 17 |
enabled in the BIOS as that is a setting. I just see the kernel command |
| 18 |
line as a bit of a hack. When I got this figured out and posted here, |
| 19 |
that was one of the things I was wondering about. Is this a good thing |
| 20 |
or bad thing? From what I have read, Linux is not supporting something |
| 21 |
and that is the reason for the failure. I'm just trying to figure out |
| 22 |
which way this thing is leaning. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Right now, this is a bit confusing. :/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives