| 1 |
Stefan G. Weichinger <lists <at> xunil.at> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be |
| 7 |
typo) from toolchain overlay |
| 8 |
> > to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached. |
| 9 |
> > It worked just fine here. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
very cool! thx. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ... and maybe later I will try |
| 17 |
> <at> system in a btrfs-subvolume. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Hello Stephan, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Very interesting. You do know that both cephfs-0.94 and gcc-5.1.x |
| 22 |
have support for RDMA. It should really speed up some applications, |
| 23 |
particularly if you are running Apache:(spark|storm) or other |
| 24 |
"in-memory" codes on top of Apache-mesos (ebuild in BGO). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The recently released (portage)t dev-java/sbt has gotten me much further |
| 27 |
along toward a working apache-spark ebuild, also in BGO. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So things are "rocking" for low-latency, HPCC in gentoo. I only regret |
| 30 |
that somebody smarter than me is doing all of this..... NONE of the |
| 31 |
old gentoo linux cluster devs are much interested in putting together |
| 32 |
a gentoo cluster from 100% sources; and I find that most baffling, |
| 33 |
particularly Donnie Berkholz. Many are using clusters at their work, |
| 34 |
based on other distros but little effort is being expended to bring |
| 35 |
100% source solutions for clustering to gentoo. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I do find lots of solutions for containers on remote (vendor) clouds and |
| 38 |
binaries for hadoop and such. Nothing so that the rank and file gentoo |
| 39 |
communities can build their High Performance Computer Clusters, (HPCC) from |
| 40 |
100% sources. Strange, real strange, at least from where I sit.... |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
THANKS for the help. |
| 43 |
James |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
James |
Archives