Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>, David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:40:31
Message-Id: 4B689BC1.7070804@kutulu.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question by Alan McKinnon
1 On 2/2/2010 3:48 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > No, you completely misunderstand what stable, unstable and masked mean.
4 >
5 > You are using stable (and call it unstable which is wrong). What you call
6 > masked is actually called unstable. Masked is something else entirely.
7 >
8 > Do not confuse these terms. They have *exact* meaning.
9
10 Has there ever been any discussion on coming up with more precise
11 wording for portage's error messages? I suspect a lot of confusion
12 between masked/keyworded comes from the fact that portage calls them all
13 "Masked", e.g.:
14
15 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=app-editors/vim-7.2.303" have been
16 masked.
17 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
18 request:
19 - app-editors/vim-7.2.303 (masked by: ~amd64 keyword)
20
21 Not that I came up with any better wording off the top of my head, but
22 is the portage team open to suggestions? Or has this issue been beaten
23 to death already?
24
25 --K

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout2/openrc question Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>