| 1 |
Am 03.08.2010 14:52, schrieb Graham Murray: |
| 2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers |
| 5 |
>> differences, not whole files. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> But is uses a *lot* more disk space on the systems as each system |
| 8 |
> contains the full history. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
While your statement is correct, you can still avoid having the whole |
| 12 |
history and make a shallow clone. It just doesn't help much because you |
| 13 |
still need all the metadata: |
| 14 |
http://blogs.gnome.org/simos/2009/04/18/git-clones-vs-shallow-git-clones/ |
Archives