| 1 |
I may be misunderstanding, but isn't this cutting back the centralized |
| 2 |
development and a pushing for more extensive use of overlays? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
To me overlays cause a problem with packages overlapping each other too |
| 5 |
much because its the way their maintainers' ebuilds are written. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If anything, I'd suggest continued gentoo centralized development with an |
| 8 |
AUR type system that is accessible to gentoo unstable users over the top if |
| 9 |
we are just throwing ideas around. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:34 AM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Here's one, very, very interesting proposals, under |
| 15 |
> serious consideration: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distributed_Gentoo |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I'd be curious what the fine and wonderful folks at |
| 21 |
> gentoo_user think of this proposal. Old farts are |
| 22 |
> welcome to comment, even encourage to "constructively rant".... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> excellent topic, |
| 26 |
> nowz ur chance to be heard! |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> hth, |
| 30 |
> James |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> :-----> |
| 33 |
> I'm not sure if Tequila and Rum make me a better dancer, or just |
| 34 |
> makes me think that 'taking a risk or 2 on the dance floor' |
| 35 |
> is a good thing. Therefore, I need, yet another Caribbean |
| 36 |
> Vacation so I can collect more data, and learn of new |
| 37 |
> ways to analyze that data >---3 |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
Archives