| 1 |
emerge neon fixed my issue.. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Thank you Alan |
| 4 |
Takk for hjelpen Bo |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 06/09/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> On Thursday 06 September 2007 12:25:10 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > > so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > What gentoo maintainer? ;) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Ah yes, I kinda just assumed that *someone* was maintaining the ebuild. |
| 15 |
> > Then I realised that we are talking about rpm. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > So, did I make a really really stupid assumption? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> If you look in metadata.xml in /usr/portage/app-arch/rpm/ (or use e.g. |
| 20 |
> herdstat to query it for you) you'll see that the maintainer |
| 21 |
> is 'maintainer-needed'. So yes, currently it has no maintainer. In my |
| 22 |
> latest |
| 23 |
> sync 498 out of 11901 packages have that status. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> Bo Andresen |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
Archives