Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Corbin Bird <corbinbird@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Scanners, sane and driver support question
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:01:22
Message-Id: 00d3228f-96ab-2e1a-616b-5ba426a083a6@charter.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Scanners, sane and driver support question by Dale
1 A family member still uses a old SCSI Mustek flat bed scanner.
2 ( Paragon 1200 SP ?? / last windows driver was for Win2K ).
3
4 Works just fine. The Linux drivers are old, but nothing wrong with them.
5
6 On 11/10/18 6:35 PM, Dale wrote:
7 > Howdy,
8 >
9 > I'm on the hunt for a scanner, flatbed type, and have been browsing Ebay
10 > and the sane project list of supported devices.  I'm leaning toward HP
11 > on this.  While looking at say a ScanJet 6200C, it says the drivers are
12 > no longer maintained but complete.  It leads me to this question.  Does
13 > that mean they are complete and fixes will no longer be made even if
14 > something breaks them and they need a little tweaking OR they are
15 > complete and if a bug pops up, they will be fixed as needed but all
16 > functions work?  I can see the logic either way on this.  I'm leaning
17 > toward the side that if something pops up that requires a little
18 > tweaking, it will be done by someone.  The drivers are just feature
19 > complete. 
20 >
21 > Does anyone else have the same thinking or is buying one of these
22 > scanners a bad idea if the drivers were to break and the scanner was
23 > rendered no longer usable? 
24 >
25 > Thanks.
26 >
27 > Dale
28 >
29 > :-)  :-) 
30 >