1 |
On Wednesday 21 Oct 2015 11:23:46 Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Indeed, on The Register the other day, in a comments sections, somebody |
4 |
> described how he had a dual boot GNU/Linux Windows setup, and after a |
5 |
> Windows update, the GNU/Linux wouldn't boot at all. He suspected that |
6 |
> the Windows update had tampered with the UEFI CMOS settings somehow. |
7 |
|
8 |
I wouldn't think that MSWindows would interfere in the UEFI settings and |
9 |
enable Secure Boot, but it may have messed up the boot loader settings - esp. |
10 |
if the poster had set up the MSWindows boot manager to chainload their Linux |
11 |
OS. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> Do modern motherboards still allow you the option of running under the |
15 |
> traditional BIOS? I've not seen this mentioned in any of the motherboard |
16 |
> descriptions recently. |
17 |
|
18 |
From what I have seen there is a conventional BIOS compatibility setting, to |
19 |
allow booting vanilla MBR disks. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Mick |