From: | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail | ||
Date: | Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:33:46 | ||
Message-Id: | 44CDF760.9060507@mid.message-center.info | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail by Suranga Kasthuriarachchi |
1 | Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Which is the best for organization mail server. |
4 | |
5 | NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise. |
6 | sendmail has had numerous holes "way back then". And I |
7 | dislike the configuration "language". |
8 | |
9 | So, I'd suggest postfix or exim. I personally use Postfix |
10 | always. It's featureful and easy enough to configure. |
11 | |
12 | Alexander Skwar |
13 | -- |
14 | Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail | Michael Crute <mcrute@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail | Ronald Vincent Vazquez <rvazquez@×××××××××××××.org> |
Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail | kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net> |