| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel |
| 2 |
<alec@××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0300, gevisz wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Yes, the full system update now proceeded without blocks, however |
| 5 |
>> with "severe warnings" while compiling firefox. They are provided below. |
| 6 |
>> But the issue with ncurces blocks seem to be resolved. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Thank you all who replied to this thread. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> >>> Completed installing firefox-38.2.0 into /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/image/ |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> * QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it |
| 13 |
>> * may exhibit random runtime failures. |
| 14 |
>> * /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/work/mozilla-esr38/intl/icu/source/i18n/ucol_bld.cpp:807:40: |
| 15 |
>> warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds] |
| 16 |
>> * /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/work/mozilla-esr38/intl/icu/source/i18n/ucol_wgt.cpp:267:57: |
| 17 |
>> warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds] |
| 18 |
>> * /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/work/mozilla-esr38/intl/icu/source/i18n/ucol_wgt.cpp:267:37: |
| 19 |
>> warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds] |
| 20 |
>> * /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/work/mozilla-esr38/intl/icu/source/i18n/ucol_wgt.cpp:267:57: |
| 21 |
>> warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds] |
| 22 |
>> * /var/tmp/portage/www-client/firefox-38.2.0/work/mozilla-esr38/intl/icu/source/i18n/ucol_wgt.cpp:267:37: |
| 23 |
>> warning: array subscript is below array bounds [-Warray-bounds] |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> * Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA |
| 26 |
>> * issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. |
| 27 |
>> * Homepage: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> This is not a problem related to ncurses - just warnings that gcc |
| 30 |
> printed during the compile process that developers should actually pay |
| 31 |
> attention to and fix. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Per the note, that would be upstream Firefox developers. Of course, |
| 34 |
anybody can send them a patch. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Rich |
Archives