Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ulogd fails to start
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:16:16
Message-Id: CAEH5T2MHk5fH=NMBBChTOi36LoRLyTSuXRFSHwRsqks=z4no7w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ulogd fails to start by Kfir Lavi
1 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Kfir Lavi <lavi.kfir@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Paul Hartman
5 > <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >>
7 >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Paul Hartman
8 >> <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
9 >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Kfir Lavi <lavi.kfir@×××××.com> wrote:
10 >> >>
11 >> >>
12 >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Paul Hartman
13 >> >> <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
14 >> >>>
15 >> >>> Hi,
16 >> >>>
17 >> >>> I emerged ulogd-2.0.0_beta4 and using the ulogd.conf that was
18 >> >>> installed by portage, it fails to start. I get this message in the
19 >> >>> log:
20 >> >>>
21 >> >>> Tue Jul 19 15:32:08 2011 <8> ulogd.c:1179 not even a single working
22 >> >>> plugin
23 >> >>> stack
24 >> >>>
25 >> >>> Does anyone know what that's about? ULOG stuff is enabled in my
26 >> >>> kernel, and the plugins are on disk where the config file says. So I
27 >> >>> don't know what's wrong...
28 >> >>>
29 >> >>> Thanks,
30 >> >>> Paul
31 >> >>>
32 >> >> What use flags did you use when installing this software?
33 >> >> It seems that you didn't specify any plugins like mysql, pcap,
34 >> >> postgres...
35 >> >
36 >> > Hi, thanks for the idea. I tried all combinations and, unfortunately,
37 >> > it fails with exactly the same error whether the USE flags are enabled
38 >> > or not. I guess I will file a bug report.
39 >>
40 >> Solved it. It was a stupid mistake of mine. :)
41 >>
42 >> In /etc/ulogd.conf all of the "stack" lines were commented out by
43 >> default. After I uncommented one, now it works.
44 >>
45 > File a bug to issue a warning at the end of the emerge, so people know it
46 > will fail.
47 > As the error line is not in the old Ulog, this is new to version 2.0.0, so
48 > it is good you
49 > found this problem now.
50
51 Done.
52
53 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375777
54
55 Thanks,
56 Paul