| 1 |
Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Am Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:29:18 +0100 |
| 4 |
> schrieb lee <lee@××××××××.de>: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement |
| 7 |
>> which is at least as good as FTP? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and |
| 10 |
>> missing features. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If you want to sync files between two sites, try rsync. It is supported |
| 13 |
> through ssh also. Plus, it's very fast also. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, I'm using it mostly for backups/copies. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The problem is that ftp is ideal for the purpose, yet users find it too |
| 18 |
difficult to use, and nobody uses it. So there must be something else |
| 19 |
as good or better which is easier to use and which ppl do use. I don't |
| 20 |
see how they would transfer files without ftp when ftp is the ideal |
| 21 |
solution. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
"Didn't work" is an error. |
Archives