1 |
On 5/13/07, Mike Williams <mike@××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Monday 14 May 2007 19:42:45 Daniel van Ham Colchete wrote: |
4 |
> > To solve this, I'm seeing 2 options right now. The first would be buying |
5 |
> a |
6 |
> > KVM-over-IP unit. But, a KVM-over-IP unit with the number of ports I |
7 |
> need |
8 |
> > is expensive, almost as expensive as the servers it will be connected. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> We use a Belkin KVM-IP box with 2 sets of ports. One set for a local |
11 |
> keyboard/monitor/mouse, and one to a 16 port Belkin KVM. |
12 |
> The IP box can handle upto 64 KVM ports, and the KVM can daisy chain to an |
13 |
> extent I don't know. |
14 |
> You don't say how many servers, but 64 is quite a lot. |
15 |
> I believe Belkin do a 4 channel IP box too. |
16 |
> Total cost was, I think, ~£700. To remotely manage >16 servers, peanuts. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
That's cheap! I'm looking at their page right now. And 64 is enough for sure |
20 |
(at least during the first year). |