| 1 |
Am 28.08.2011 20:44, schrieb Florian Philipp: |
| 2 |
> Am 28.08.2011 13:14, schrieb Mick: |
| 3 |
>> On Sunday 07 Aug 2011 16:20:18 Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Am 07.08.2011 02:22, schrieb Mick: |
| 5 |
>>>> On Friday 05 Aug 2011 23:08:38 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:59:00 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>>> Yes, this was introduced in 3.8.0 to fix security issues [1]. Change |
| 8 |
>>>>>> your config to look like this: |
| 9 |
>>>>>> /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log { |
| 10 |
>>>>>> su portage portage |
| 11 |
>>>>>> ... |
| 12 |
>>>>>> } |
| 13 |
>>>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>>>> Disclaimer: I've not really tried this (yet) but I think I'm able to |
| 15 |
>>>>>> read changelogs and man-pages. ;-) |
| 16 |
>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>> Yes that fixes it. The latest portage ebuilds include an updated config |
| 18 |
>>>>> file. |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> Hmm ... it still complains here! |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>>> error: error setting owner of |
| 23 |
>>>> /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log-20110801.gz: Operation not permitted |
| 24 |
>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>> |
| 26 |
>>>> This is my /etc/logrotate.d/elog-save-summary: |
| 27 |
>>>> =================================== |
| 28 |
>>>> /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log { |
| 29 |
>>>> |
| 30 |
>>>> su portage portage |
| 31 |
>>>> |
| 32 |
>>>> missingok |
| 33 |
>>>> nocreate |
| 34 |
>>>> delaycompress |
| 35 |
>>>> |
| 36 |
>>>> } |
| 37 |
>>>> =================================== |
| 38 |
>>>> |
| 39 |
>>>> # ls -la /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log |
| 40 |
>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root portage 4326 Aug 6 09:44 |
| 41 |
>>>> /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log |
| 42 |
>>>> |
| 43 |
>>>> Can you see anything amiss? |
| 44 |
>>> |
| 45 |
>>> At least on my system, /var/log/portage has the following permissions: |
| 46 |
>>> drwxr-xr-x root root |
| 47 |
>>> |
| 48 |
>>> Only root can write, therefore the config must read |
| 49 |
>>> |
| 50 |
>>> /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log { |
| 51 |
>>> su root portage |
| 52 |
>>> missingok |
| 53 |
>>> nocreate |
| 54 |
>>> delaycompress |
| 55 |
>>> } |
| 56 |
>> |
| 57 |
>> The latest logrotate update wanted to change the above line from su root |
| 58 |
>> portage to su portage portage ... |
| 59 |
>> |
| 60 |
>> Should I be changing the ownership of /var/log/portage and /var/log/portage |
| 61 |
>> elog? |
| 62 |
> |
| 63 |
> Unless portage now drops privileges from root:portage to portage:portage |
| 64 |
> for writing logs, no one except root should be allowed to write in |
| 65 |
> /var/log/portage. So, from my point of view, the answer is no. |
| 66 |
> |
| 67 |
> It seems so: |
| 68 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374287 |
| 69 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378451 |
| 70 |
> |
| 71 |
> This version of portage has just been stabilized this week. |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> Regards, |
| 74 |
> Florian Philipp |
| 75 |
> |
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
Argh, sorry. I just saw that I forgot to delete the first paragraph |
| 78 |
after looking at portage's changelog. The answer is yes, not no. ;) |
Archives