Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:04
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0904131700x51671760p70185c2b4e67aac5@mail.gmail.com
1 Hi,
2 I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was
3 to be run at boot time or as a default level process? Googling for
4 'rc-update add hald default' turns up more responses than it does for
5 boot, but they are both out there. Seems like if you wanted to
6 recognize hardware it would be good to do it at boot time, but maybe
7 it just doesn't work...
8
9 This Gentoo page says default, which is the way I'm using it:
10
11 http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/HAL
12
13 but I've seen a few emails from some very knowledgeable folks who have
14 said boot when answering questions on these lists. Possibly they just
15 made a mistake or were making assumptions. Don't know.
16
17 It's not even mentioned in the X86 handbook:
18
19 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1
20
21 So, for clarity and correctness, which way is the intended way to use it?
22
23 Asking because of problems created with the new xorg-x11 update.
24
25 Thanks,
26 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot? Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot? Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org>