1 |
John J. Foster ha scritto: |
2 |
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:32:26AM +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote: |
3 |
>> I think you're missing the point. I never asked the community to |
4 |
>> change its rules. I'm only saying that these particular rules were |
5 |
>> invisible, and there's no way to find out about it, and that's going |
6 |
>> to be a problem for any user community. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> OK, but don't you honestly think we could just move on now and talk |
9 |
> about Gentoo. Please. |
10 |
|
11 |
Please not. |
12 |
|
13 |
The user is complaining of a *damn serious* problem. His emails were |
14 |
ignored for an undocumented formatting community rule, and it made |
15 |
impossible for him to use the mailing list, without anything alarming |
16 |
him of the problem until late. |
17 |
|
18 |
I do not use html email myself, but what happened to him is surely plain |
19 |
wrong. |
20 |
|
21 |
And what's even worse, instead of people concerning about that and how |
22 |
to solve the situation in the future, there is a lot of people giggling |
23 |
and behaving like "OMG H4X0RZ" against the "lame n00b" , ignoring the |
24 |
fact that not everyone in this world has been born uttering his first |
25 |
words on Usenet. |
26 |
|
27 |
Please. He's completely right in demanding apologies and a swift |
28 |
reaction to the problem -because if users cannot access the list due to |
29 |
undocumented stuff, it's a problem. |
30 |
|
31 |
Also: to the people filtering out html mail: why? No, really, *why*? My |
32 |
mail client is set to receive html mail and convert it in plain text |
33 |
transparently, so I *never* see the html. Why can't you do so? It's not |
34 |
1990 anymore. Could you use a more serious email client? What's the |
35 |
point in filtering out content because of formatting? You dislike html? |
36 |
Have your client convert it in text. You think it's heavier than it |
37 |
should be? Hmm, we live in a world of broadband and 1-Tb hard disks, and |
38 |
emerge -auv world, do you really complain for a couple more kb? |
39 |
|
40 |
I understand the fascination with the Ancient Unix Tools, but don't you |
41 |
think a bit more elasticity is worthwile in 2009? |
42 |
|
43 |
m. |