| 1 |
> On May 21, 2014, at 13:33, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:02:46 -0400 |
| 4 |
> Hunter Jozwiak <hunter.t.joz@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Hi all. I made the following in /etc/portage/make.conf |
| 7 |
>> #ACCEPT_LICENS="*" |
| 8 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" |
| 9 |
>> Save and exit. |
| 10 |
>> To double check, I ran: |
| 11 |
>> #emerge --info | grep -i accept |
| 12 |
>> ACCEPT_LICENSES="* -@EULA" |
| 13 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" |
| 14 |
>> The way it looks, the file just appended what I want to the Portage |
| 15 |
>> default. As far as the keywords variable is concerned, that will cause |
| 16 |
>> issues. Do I need to negate the defaults with the -? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> ACCEPT_LICENSES is commented out; so, yes, it'll use the default. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS I think that ~x86 includes, similar to how maintainers |
| 21 |
> specify KEYWORDS="x86" and not KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" in their ebuilds; |
| 22 |
> I'm not entirely sure, but I think that would be the case. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> You can check with something like ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~x86" |
| 25 |
> which might result in something that lists all the stable ones as well. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Negating x86 with - could be a possible solution; however, I wonder if |
| 28 |
> that's what you want as some packages have only stable versions. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> With kind regards, |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 34 |
> Gentoo Developer |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 37 |
> GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 38 |
> GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
| 39 |
I commented that out for the purposes of having it in the email as a sort of example. It isn't actually commented I was in the file. So having the x86 and the ~x86 in the same variable would make a safe portage solution? |
Archives