| 1 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:38:12 +0800, "Mark David Dumlao" |
| 2 |
<stuffinator@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:52 PM, Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:37:16PM +0800, Penguin Lover Mark David |
| 6 |
> Dumlao |
| 7 |
>> squawked: |
| 8 |
>> > TOTALLY WEIRD. I do a layman -L on my machine and strangely enough, |
| 9 |
>> ecatmur |
| 10 |
>> > isn't listed. I think I've used it beore on layman though, so I look |
| 11 |
> up |
| 12 |
>> the |
| 13 |
>> > overlays listing on the gentoo overlays list, here: |
| 14 |
>> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/layman-global.txt |
| 15 |
>> > |
| 16 |
>> > Sure enough, ecatmur is present. So I just blindly go layman -a |
| 17 |
> ecatmur |
| 18 |
>> and |
| 19 |
>> > he gets added. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> Did you run layman --fetch to update the overlays? |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> yep, and I'm still getting nothing doing with layman -L. |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> thing. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
For me it helped to change following line in layman.cfg: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
# Strict checking of overlay definitions |
| 30 |
# |
| 31 |
# Set either to "yes" or "no". If "no" layman will issue |
| 32 |
# warnings if an overlay definition is missing either |
| 33 |
# description or contact information. |
| 34 |
# |
| 35 |
nocheck : no |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
to yes. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives