1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> [11-07-03 03:08]: |
2 |
> Grant wrote: |
3 |
> >>>Is Nvidia still the way to go instead of ATI? I use the nouveau |
4 |
> >>>drivers with my onboard Nvidia chipset now and they've been fine for |
5 |
> >>>the most part. I use a threaded ffmpeg to decode HD video instead |
6 |
> >>>of |
7 |
> >>>VDPAU so I don't bother with nvidia-drivers. |
8 |
> >>> |
9 |
> >>>- Grant |
10 |
> >>> |
11 |
> >>I don't have any experience with ATI but I still use Nvidia and their |
12 |
> >>drivers. I haven't had any problems as of yet. I did have a video |
13 |
> >>problem |
14 |
> >>once but it was a kernel problem. For me, I see no need in me |
15 |
> >>getting a ATI |
16 |
> >>card. That's just me. |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >>Dale |
19 |
> >> |
20 |
> >I've just read that Nvidia no longer makes onboard video. Has anyone |
21 |
> >else heard that? |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> >Are server motherboard more reliable? |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> >- Grant |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I looked around on newegg and found that there are several mobos that |
32 |
> have Nvidia video built in. It seems they do still make them. I'm not |
33 |
> sure if the video or mobos are any that you would like but they are |
34 |
> being made at least. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Me, I tend to buy video cards. They have upgrade options without |
37 |
> having to put in a new mobo. YMMV tho. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> No idea on server boards. I would think they would be more reliable |
40 |
> tho. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Dale |
43 |
> |
44 |
> :-) :-) |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
I prefer overclocker boards and dont overclock them. Most of them |
48 |
have a better heat dissipation and the PCB has a better layout |
49 |
HF-wise. |
50 |
|
51 |
Only my two cent...you currency may vary ;) |
52 |
|
53 |
Best regards |
54 |
mcc |