Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ro /
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:03:15
Message-Id: CAKpSnpKH66U7VyEfzm_DLP+4bCh5DRY8EcjSRxpzfJTcn4oOzw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ro / by Michael Morak
1 On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Michael Morak <michael.morak@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 13 January 2017 at 23:04, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > Almost, but not quite. The problem is that the POSIX standard requires that
6 > any file *must* continue to exist until all file handles pointing to it are
7 > closed. Thus, using your example, when file foo.so gets replaced, the new
8 > foo.so is written to the disk somewhere, but, since foobard holds an open
9 > file handle, the old file is not deleted from the disk yet. At that point,
10 > the content of *both* files (and relevant inodes, etc.) exists on the
11 > *disk*, and, in addition, there is a pending delete operation for the old
12 > file (that is, a "write" operation to /). This prevents / from being mounted
13 > ro, since the pending write must be executed first (hence the message "/ is
14 > busy").
15 >
16 OK, I think I understand it.
17
18
19 > operation and output a list for you. The needrestart script can also try to
20 > automatically restart them for you.
21
22 I wouldn't want that.
23
24 Thanks
25
26 Jorge

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ro / Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>