Archives
Archives
| From: | Ajai Khattri <ajai@××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What's the story with 2.6.35 kernel? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:05:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100911120248.P55879@shell.bway.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: What's the story with 2.6.35 kernel? by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Extremely bad idea. It's no wonder something did break. You can't just |
| 4 | > "silentoldconfig" between kernel versions and expect it to always work. At |
| 5 | > least "oldconfig" would catch new options (which might be options replacing |
| 6 | > old ones.) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | silentoldconfig shows all the new options too. I think the main problem |
| 9 | was the changes in udev. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | A |