| 1 |
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 19:35, pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Andrey Vul wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> The real question here is why isn't radeon-ucode a dependency of |
| 5 |
>> xf86-video-radeonhd ? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, the radeon-ucode is only for r6xx/7xx chips so pulling it in for |
| 8 |
> r5xx would be pointless... I just noticed that you have a radeon hd4200 |
| 9 |
> which is a RS880 chip. Not sure if this is supported yet. Does |
| 10 |
> acceleration (2D/3D) work for you? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
According to git, all the r7xx except for rs880 are on the |
| 13 |
working/testing list. Which sucks, tbh: why did I bother to get |
| 14 |
integrated when I could've gotten a better motherboard (with 1394 |
| 15 |
support) and a $50 graphics card? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
What's the point of getting acceleration to work if the kernel can't |
| 18 |
modeset correctly? Is it worth compiling radeon_drm + r700 fw into the |
| 19 |
kernel? |
Archives