1 |
On 2012-01-02 3:48 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 09:29:57 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> That works for the case where the software is managed by portage, |
5 |
>> which is likely 99.9999% of what's on Gentoo systems worldwide. It |
6 |
>> doesn't work however for the odd case where I write some little |
7 |
>> program which requires a library (ta-lib in my portage file) and I |
8 |
>> don't write an ebuild to build it. I've never bothered to learn to do |
9 |
>> my own ebuilds but at some level it would be a good idea, and I think |
10 |
>> it would address Mr. Orlitsky's issue about what his users need and |
11 |
>> why. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> That's more easily handled with sets. No ebuild writing skills are needed |
14 |
> and there's no danger of atoms being accidentally added to the set. |
15 |
|
16 |
This sounds very interesting... |
17 |
|
18 |
Neil, is the use of sets fully documented somewhere? I don't recall |
19 |
reading about them in the Handbook, but its been a while since I read it |
20 |
(and don't remember if I ever did cover to cover)... |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks! |