Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update behavior
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:51:11
Message-Id: 4F02EB59.5070905@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update behavior by Neil Bothwick
1 On 2012-01-02 3:48 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 09:29:57 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
3 >
4 >> That works for the case where the software is managed by portage,
5 >> which is likely 99.9999% of what's on Gentoo systems worldwide. It
6 >> doesn't work however for the odd case where I write some little
7 >> program which requires a library (ta-lib in my portage file) and I
8 >> don't write an ebuild to build it. I've never bothered to learn to do
9 >> my own ebuilds but at some level it would be a good idea, and I think
10 >> it would address Mr. Orlitsky's issue about what his users need and
11 >> why.
12 >
13 > That's more easily handled with sets. No ebuild writing skills are needed
14 > and there's no danger of atoms being accidentally added to the set.
15
16 This sounds very interesting...
17
18 Neil, is the use of sets fully documented somewhere? I don't recall
19 reading about them in the Handbook, but its been a while since I read it
20 (and don't remember if I ever did cover to cover)...
21
22 Thanks!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update behavior Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>