1 |
Holla <holla.net@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Jan 11, 2008 8:09 PM, YoYo Siska <yoyo@××××××.sk> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> one other thing, if nat doesn't work, some wireless aps (i'm thinking |
6 |
>> about the 192.168.2.1) need to have correctly set up default gateway |
7 |
>> etc... they sometimes try to be to smart and I had sometimes problems |
8 |
>> when the router was connected as a wireless client to them... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Can you give some clues about what you mean by correctly setup gw ? |
11 |
|
12 |
Hey guys... it would help if you trim your posts so there isn't so |
13 |
much in each message. |
14 |
|
15 |
By correct gateway I think in this case it would be the inward facing |
16 |
address of pc1 (192.168.2.43) so on router2 you would set the gw to |
17 |
that address. |
18 |
And on pc2 the gw would be 192.168.2.1. That is unless router2 is |
19 |
just a WAP (wireless access point). |
20 |
|
21 |
But I'm not sure I understand all of this. It might be good to |
22 |
include the make of the routers (even model number might matter). |
23 |
|
24 |
Excuse me if this info is already in these monster size messages |
25 |
somewhere but: |
26 |
If you redo the diagram please include this information: |
27 |
make and model of router2 |
28 |
What OS is running on pc1 and pc2 |
29 |
|
30 |
Annotate in one line what gateways are set at the various points. |
31 |
|
32 |
The adsl router make and model may not matter too much. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |