Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: No static or multilib support for libtcl?
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:40:42
Message-Id: lf5a62$45u$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: No static or multilib support for libtcl? by eroen
1 On 2014-03-04, eroen <eroen@××××××××××××.eu> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:35:30 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards
3 ><grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> Why isn't there a static or mutlilib libtcl.so?
5 >>
6 >> When I want to build a static binary that uses libtcl, I have to build
7 >> my own private copy of libtcl?
8 >>
9 >
10 > I don't know about a static one, but versions since
11 > dev-lang/tcl-8.5.15-r1 are multilib-enabled through the abi_x86_64 use
12 > flag (or the related ABI_X86 use_expand) in testing arches.
13 >
14 > Unfortunately, this capability is presently difficult to leverage on
15 > stable arches,
16
17 After some further googling and reading of Changelogs, that's pretty
18 much what I had surmised.
19
20 > particularly because the dependency on multilib zlib which
21 > (indirectly through blockers) turns this into an all-or-nothing
22 > affair unless you can live without multilib variants of the other
23 > libraries that have until now been provided by the
24 > emul-linux-x86-baselibs package.
25 >
26 > For your requirements, I would suggest you rather build tcl yourself
27 > for your development and leave the gentoo packaged version for use
28 > with other packages that use it.
29
30 OK, thanks for confirming that I wasn't missing something obvious. :)
31
32 --
33 Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! HAIR TONICS, please!!
34 at
35 gmail.com