1 |
On 2014-03-04, eroen <eroen@××××××××××××.eu> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:35:30 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards |
3 |
><grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> Why isn't there a static or mutlilib libtcl.so? |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> When I want to build a static binary that uses libtcl, I have to build |
7 |
>> my own private copy of libtcl? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I don't know about a static one, but versions since |
11 |
> dev-lang/tcl-8.5.15-r1 are multilib-enabled through the abi_x86_64 use |
12 |
> flag (or the related ABI_X86 use_expand) in testing arches. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Unfortunately, this capability is presently difficult to leverage on |
15 |
> stable arches, |
16 |
|
17 |
After some further googling and reading of Changelogs, that's pretty |
18 |
much what I had surmised. |
19 |
|
20 |
> particularly because the dependency on multilib zlib which |
21 |
> (indirectly through blockers) turns this into an all-or-nothing |
22 |
> affair unless you can live without multilib variants of the other |
23 |
> libraries that have until now been provided by the |
24 |
> emul-linux-x86-baselibs package. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> For your requirements, I would suggest you rather build tcl yourself |
27 |
> for your development and leave the gentoo packaged version for use |
28 |
> with other packages that use it. |
29 |
|
30 |
OK, thanks for confirming that I wasn't missing something obvious. :) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! HAIR TONICS, please!! |
34 |
at |
35 |
gmail.com |