| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:40:48 -0600 |
| 2 |
Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Philip Webb wrote: |
| 5 |
> > 071218 Sergey Kobzar wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> - ReiserFS looks unsupported now |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What do you base that assessment on ? It's true |
| 11 |
> > that RFS 4 was going nowhere even before its creator's legal |
| 12 |
> > problems, but RFS 3 is still well-supported as a Gentoo pkg, isn't |
| 13 |
> > it ? When I installed Gentoo on my new desktop machine recently, |
| 14 |
> > I used RFS 3 for everything except /boot (which is Ext2). |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I too use ReiserFS for everything but /boot. I used to use it for |
| 19 |
> that but the 32MB thing sort of got me to change it to ext3. I have |
| 20 |
> had no problems with file system errors. I have three hard drives |
| 21 |
> and 9 partitions, 8 are ReiserFS, and it works great. I may even give |
| 22 |
> ReiserFS 4 a shot in the future. I'm not sure if it is even being |
| 23 |
> developed any more tho. Anybody hear anything on that? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Dale |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> :-) :-) :-) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I, too, use reiserfs for everything I can. EXT3, the last time I used |
| 30 |
it, is much slower, Sure, you can tweak it, but you can do that to |
| 31 |
Reiser too. I trust it now, and don't intend to switch to anything |
| 32 |
else any time soon. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I have always found this FS review well presented and very useful: |
| 35 |
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/388 |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives